Platform Consolidation vs Best-of-Breed: The Question That Actually Decides It

“Consolidate onto one platform” and “pick best-of-breed for each function” both get argued as if one is universally right. Neither is. The question that actually matters is which specific cost each approach is asking you to accept — and most organisations pick a side before anyone has named the cost honestly. Consolidation’s advocates point to …

Read more

The Seams That Let You Replace a Vendor Later — Designed In, Not Retrofitted

You cannot retrofit replaceability into a system after it’s been built the wrong way for three years. The seams that let you swap a vendor later have to be designed in from the first architecture decision — and almost nobody makes that decision deliberately, because it costs a little more up front for a benefit …

Read more

The Vendor Evaluation Questions a Feature Comparison Will Never Ask

Every vendor RFP asks the questions a vendor is well-rehearsed to answer well. The questions that actually reveal risk are the ones a good salesperson visibly hesitates on — and most evaluation processes never ask them, because they don’t fit neatly into a feature-comparison scorecard. I’ve written about the build-vs-buy framework that has to survive …

Read more

The EU Data Act Gave You the Right to Leave Your Cloud Provider — Check Your Contract

The EU handed every cloud customer a statutory right to leave their provider without penalty. Most contracts, including ones signed well after the right became enforceable, still don’t reflect it — and the deadline to stop paying to leave arrives 12 January 2027. I’ve written elsewhere about measuring vendor lock-in before you sign. The Data …

Read more

Writing a Technology Strategy That Actually Fits on Two Pages

Most technology strategy documents are unread by design. Forty pages, a dozen slides of architecture diagrams, an executive summary nobody wrote last because nobody was forced to compress the argument first. A strategy that can’t fit on two pages usually isn’t a strategy — it’s an inventory wearing a strategy’s title. The length isn’t the …

Read more

Governance Is Not Who Decides. It’s How You Find Out.

Ask any organisation who’s responsible for a given technology decision and you’ll get an answer immediately. Ask them how they’d know if that person made the wrong call, and how long it would take to find out, and the confidence usually evaporates. Governance isn’t about who decides. It’s about how the organisation finds out, and …

Read more

Architecture Before Technology Selection: A Repeatable Decision Sequence

I’ve written about why regulation, and the data model, both have to precede the tool. This is the practical version of that argument — not the philosophy, the actual repeatable sequence, usable on any technology decision regardless of size, that keeps the reasoning from collapsing into “let’s just look at some vendors” by the second …

Read more

Model-Agnostic Architecture: Abstracting the AI Provider

Every organisation building on a specific AI model right now is making a bet on that model’s continued existence, pricing, and behaviour — a bet the model providers themselves have shown, repeatedly, they can change the terms of with a deprecation notice and a migration deadline measured in weeks. I’ve written about vendor-agnostic architecture as …

Read more

Quantifying Risk for People Who Don’t Read Code

“High, medium, or low” is not quantification. It’s a colour-coded opinion, and the fact that it appears on a risk register with the word “risk” attached gives it a false authority that a genuinely quantified estimate would earn honestly and a three-tier label never does. I’ve written about translating engineering risk into board language specifically. …

Read more

Book a Pillar 07 - Investment & Portfolio Control scoping call